HumDay

The Make alternative with no canvas to maintain

Make gives you a visual canvas and meters every operation. HumDay removes the canvas: describe the outcome, approve a contract, watch it proven on real data before it touches your accounts.

Start freeSee what people build →

HumDay vs Make, at a glance

 
HumDay
Make
How you build
Describe the outcome in plain words — the automation is written for you.
Draw each scenario: modules, routes, filters, mappings.
Before it runs live
A contract you approve, then a proof run on real data.
Run-once on the canvas; inspect each module's output.
Apps
Any app that publishes an API description — 1,357 catalogued so far, no hand-built connector needed.
Large hand-built catalogue, plus HTTP modules you wire yourself.
Pricing
Plans with included credits — no per-step metering.
Per operation: every module execution counts.
When something fails
Retries, stops and duplicate rules fixed in the contract; failures reported with evidence.
Error handlers you attach and maintain per module.
Best for
People who want the outcome, with proof — nothing to wire.
Visual thinkers who want control of every module.

How an automation gets built here

  1. Describe the outcome. In your own words — what should happen, not which endpoints to call.
  2. Approve the contract. Exactly what it will do, which accounts it touches, and what happens on failure — before anything is built.
  3. See it proven. The generated program runs on real data and shows you the result before it is allowed near a live account.
  4. Grant access, then go live. You approve the specific operations it may use — and only those.

When Make is the better fit

Make is genuinely strong for people who think visually and want to control every module — the canvas is expressive, and operations pricing can be economical for high-volume simple scenarios. If that is you, stay. HumDay is for the people who never wanted a canvas: they wanted the thing done, and evidence that it works.

Questions people ask

Is HumDay a good Make (Integromat) alternative?
If the canvas is the part of Make you tolerate rather than enjoy, yes: describe the job in plain words, approve the contract, watch the proof run, go live. If you love the canvas, Make remains a capable tool.
Does HumDay support as many apps as Make?
The two numbers measure different things. Make counts app modules someone built and maintains by hand; HumDay reads an app's own published API description, so the 1,357 catalogued apps are what is indexed for browsing — not the limit of what runs. If an app publishes machine-readable API docs, it can be automated, whether or not it is in the catalogue yet. And if an app publishes no API at all, HumDay says so plainly instead of promising a workaround.
Can I migrate my Make scenarios to HumDay?
There is no importer, and you will not miss it: describe what the scenario does in one sentence and approve the contract HumDay writes back. Most scenarios are one sentence — "when a payment lands in Stripe, email the customer a receipt" — and the proof run shows it working before you switch anything off.
Does HumDay meter operations like Make?
No. Plans include credits, and a run is not billed per module executed — adding a step to an automation is a design decision, not a pricing one.
How is HumDay different from an AI agent running my automations?
An AI agent decides while it runs and you read about it afterwards. Here every decision is settled in advance in a contract you approved, and the generated program cannot reach any service the contract did not name — not as a policy, but because the gateway will not route it.

Other comparisons

Statements about Make describe our understanding of their public product and pricing model as of August 2026 — check their site for current details. Statements about HumDay are the product’s own promises, and every automation it builds carries the evidence to check them.